Adapted from Alberta Environment: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$Department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex1341

Importance of Soil Sampling & Testing
When to Sample
Where to Sample
- Random Sampling
- Benchmark Sampling
Topography
Soil Variablity
Sampling Tools & Methods
Preparing & Submitting Samples
Laboratory Analysis
Prices

 

Importance of Soil Sampling & Testing
Soil testing has become an important tool for assessing soil fertility and arriving at proper fertilizer recommendations.It's also a valuable management aid for studying soil changes resulting from cropping practices and for diagnosing specific cropping problems. As producer, you want to maximize your production, while limiting your input costs.

Many producers will "eyeball" the amount of fertilizer they require. Failure to properly sample and/or test their soils' nutrient levels can result in two counter-productive results:
Under-application of fertilizer: the end yeilds are not maximized, and a lack of possible Revenue is experienced
Over-application of fertilizer or a particular nutrient of fertilizer: Input costs are exceeded, and Profit Margins decrease.

Soil testing provices an index for the nutrient availablity in soil and is a critical step in nutrient management planning. Soil sampling technique, timeing and sampling and type of analysis need to be considered for accurate results. The biggest problem in the effective use of soil testing is proper and representative sampling. Proper soil sampling will provide accurate soil test results and reliable nutrient recommendations.

The following information is offered to answer special questions concerning soil sampling. Further information and guidance can be obtained by contacting your fertilizer dealer, private laboratory or crop advisor.

When to Sample
Cultivated field for spring seeding should be sampled after October 1. These fields can also be sampled in the spring, but time may be limited then. Fields for fall-seeding crops should be sampled one month before seeding. Forage fields for seed, pasture or hay may be sampled after September 1. Problem soil areas may be sampled anytime. Frozen and water-logged soils should not be sampled because of the difficulty in obtaining a representative sample.

Where to Sample
Soil variability is a major concern when deciding how to collect a representative soil sample. Soil samples submitted for analysis should be representative of the field or portion of a field. Therefore, by sampling from an area of the field where yield is typically average, soil test results should come back with an average representation of the field.Identifying areas that are representative can be difficult without a first-hand knowledge of the field. If the person taking the soil samples does not take the time or have the knowldge required to take a sample in the appropriate location, the results can come back somewhat unrepresentative.

Random soil sampling is the traditional approach that works for uniform fields with little variation. The managed random sampling technique samples from areas identified as average production areas. This approach is different from random sampling, which provides an average of all cores taken throughout your field. Managed random sampling is recommended if you cannot identify a dominant production area on your field.

Benchmark sampling is recommend for fields with more variability (hills, pot holes, etc.). Benchmark sampling reduces the inherent variability of a field by reducing the area sampled. A small area (generally about - of an acre) representing the majority of the field is sampled the same number of times as in random sampling. This is the reference area from which fertilizer recommendations are made.

The benchmark site should be marked with a global positioning system (GPS) or other means so that one can return there for subsequent years' sampling. Sampling from the same area will reduce sampling variability and create a better picture of year-to-year changes. Creating more then one benchmark is recommended if you cannot identify a dominant producation area on your field.

Topography
is very important to consider as well. Rolling hills, draws, slopes and valleys allow nutrients to follow gravity, and water flow. It is not atypical to see nutrients bled out of higher-elevation areas, and accumulated in lower-lying areas; typical of water flow.

Soil Variability also plays a key role: as soil components will retain or release nutrients from leaching, plant uptake, and hydraulic flow differently (i.e. sandy soil transports nutrients much quicker (and therefore holds nutrients less) than a higher clay soil. Dividing a field into management zones allows for an understanding of different conditions within a field. This approach is particularly effective in rolling and hummocky landscapes. For example, a large depression may be a very productive area, but a separate soil test may indicate it can be optimized with a higher rate of nitrogen than the benchmark is indicating. While most producers do not have variable rate capabilities, rates can often be easily increased through other adjustments.
In the first year, analyzing a few separate benchmark areas will reduce the risk of getting a sample not representative of the field. Although there are higher costs for laboratory analysis, this technique helps determine what area to use as a benchmark for future soil sampling.

When picking a benchmark area, use observable features such as soil color and landscape to identify where different soil types occur. Select a site that has characteristics similar to most of the field or the dominant soil type.

Often, the best time to identify different soil characteristics is through crop development. At the beginning of the growing season, differences in crop establishment and vigor can be seen, making a represntative location easier to pick out. Other ways of selecting postential benchmark sites include the use productivity, yield, aerial and/or topographic maps.

The benchmark process can be further extended by establishing a couple of benchmark areas in different areas that allow customization of fertilizer rates. by identifying a primary benchmark area, and a secondary benchmark area and perhaps even a tertiary benchmark area, a fine-tuned fertility management strategy can be achieved even without variable rate technology.

Each field (with the same crop and management history) must be sampled separately. Size up each field and observe variations in yield and crop growth, texture, color, slope, degree of erosion, drainage and past treatment. Sizable areas of fields where growth is significantly different from the rest of the field should be sampled separately.

Avoid unusual areas such as dead or back furrows, old straw, hay or manure piles, waterways, saline spots, eroded knolls and old fence rows. Select 15 to 20 sampling sites representative of the portion of the field to be tested

.Sample tools and methods
Representative soil samples can best be obtained by using a core sampling tool. The use of a proper sampling tool is essential for sampling to depths below 15 cm. Take soil cores from 0-15 cm at each of the 15 to 20 sampling site. For Improved nitrogen and sulfur evaluation or where problem soils are encountered, separate samples should be taken from 0-15 cm, 15-20 cm and 30-60 cm depths at the sam 15 to 20 sites.

Place cores in clean pails or bags then mix cores taken from the same depths, crushing lumps in the process. Keep samples taken from individual depths separate from one another. Soil samplers may be available on request from fertilizer dealsers, private labs or crop advisors. Many fertilizer dealers offer soil sampling services.

Preparing and submitting samples
How the soil is handled after sampling is just as important as collecting the soil sample. Remove half a kilogram, and air dry to stop nitrate build-up. To air dry, spread a thin layer of soil on a clean piece of paper, plastic sheets or clean, shallow containers (plastic, aluminum, etc) in a clean room at room temperature. Do not dry with artificial heat. Some laboratories accept moist samples, but these samples must be delivered to the laboratory the same day as they are collected. Samples can also be stored in a refrigerator for a couple of days or frozen if sample delivery is delayed. Keep a completed field plan of the area represented by each sample for your own records.

Central Labs recommends soil samples of minimum 1.5 cups (350mL). A clean, plastic bag (Ziploc or any comparable brand) is preferred. You MUST label each sample with your name, address, postal code, field and depth from wich the sample was taken.
Repeat these steps for each sample.
Central labs will provide a Chain of Custody for you to fill out. It will have spaces as to what analysis should be performed, who to report results to and by what method (fax, email, snail-mail) and costs.

Laboratory analysis
Research in Alberta indicates that the typical soil analyses package for surface (0-15 or 0-30 cm) agricultural soils should include soil tests for nitrate-nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and extractable sulfur, plus soil pH and salinity (electrical conductivity). If possible, the nitrate and sulfur analysis should be completed for subsurface soil samples (15-30 and 30-60 cm). Additional analyes for micronutients (Boron, Chlorin, Copper, Iron, Maganese, or Zinc) may be provided at a slight additional cost.

Central Laboratories has two packages available for soil nuturients.

1) Soil Chemistry: a saturated-paste analysis will report the following:
pH, (Alkalinity), Electrical conductivity, Chloride, Sulfate, Nitrate, Nitrite, Phosphate, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium, Postassium, total dissolved Solids, & Ion Balance.

2) Soil Texture Analysis:
Component % (Sand/Silt/Clay)
Moisture Content

Central Laboratories Ltd. provides only analysis of the parameters within the scope of an associated package, unless prior arrangments have been made. We CAN NOT, legally, provide interpretations on nutrients applications.
We highly recommend:

A certified Agrologist (P.Ag.)
Alberta Institute of Agrologists
The government of Alberta: Agriculture & Rural Development, and their "AFFIRM" Software:
http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/softdown.nsf/main?openform&type=AFFIRM&page=information

Other Internet Resources
Many Gracious thanks to Len Kryanowski, P. Ag. (Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development) for his valuable advice.

TOP